California State Assemblyman Reggie Jones-Sawyer, whose brand new online poker bill is far more inclusive than previous drafts, would welcome racetracks and PokerStars into the Golden State gaming market as well.
A California that is new online bill, sponsored by State Assemblyman Reggie Jones-Sawyer (D-Los Angeles), is now on the table to oppose the bill introduced by fellow State Assemblyman Mike Gatto in December.
The Sawyer-Jones bill, AB 167, seeks to determine ‘a proper regulatory framework in place that provides safe and compliant internet poker access,’ the assemblyman announced yesterday.
So how do the two brand new bills compare? And more to the point, how does the Jones-Sawyer that is new bill with his past bill, AB2291, which foundered regarding the rocks of final year’s legislative session?
No actors that are bad
Jones-Sawyer said at the conclusion of the 2014 session that the new, revised bill would have been a high priority for 2015, and indicated that this time, the ‘bad actor’ language is softened. The non-severable bad star clauses of AB229 proved to become a sticking point for stakeholders, and caused a significant schism between those who wanted PokerStars in industry and the ones who didn’t.
As expected, AB 167 seems to own removed those actor that is bad, apparently clearing the means for PokerStars to enter a regulated California market. Those precluded from applying for a internet poker license, states the bill, include:
‘The individual [who] has contemptuously defied a legislative investigative body, or other formal investigative human anatomy of a state or associated with united states of america or an international jurisdiction, whenever that body is engaged in the investigation of crimes relating to poker, official corruption associated to poker activities, or unlawful profiteering activity or organized crime, as defined in area l 86.2 of this Penal Code.’
The bill goes on to clarify a key place that could straight affect PokerStars potential entry into the Golden State market, given its previously vilified owners vs. its new, ‘clean slate’ ones.
‘ The individual [who] has been convicted in a court of competent jurisdiction of a felony consisting of either having accepted a bet over the Internet in breach of United States or California law, or having aided or abetted that unlawful task.’
Note the utilization regarding the word ‘person,’ which suggests that PokerStars, by divesting itself of its previous owners, against whom there were DOJ that is outstanding, would have the ability to participate in the California online market unscathed.
Anti-PokerStars Coalition Denounces Language
The language is in sharp contrast with that of last year’s bill from Jones-Sawyer, which proposed to exclude ‘any brand or business name, including any brand that is derivative with the exact same or similar wording, or any trade or solution mark, computer software, technology, operational system, customer information, or other data acquired, derived, or developed directly or indirectly from any operation that has accepted a wager or engaged in a financial transaction associated with such bet from any person in the usa on any kind of Internet gaming after December 31, 2006.’
If Jones-Sawyer thinks his bill will sail through because of the backing for the stakeholders, however, he has another think coming, as the anti-PokerStars coalition that is tribal no time in denouncing this language.
‘There is much for tribes to dislike about it bill,’ said Pechanga Chairman Mark Macarro. ‘We are disappointed that the bill disregards important principles from a broad coalition of respected tribes and card spaces that help avoid corporations and entities that previously violated law that is federal profiting from tainted software, brands, and databases derived from illegal activity.’
Photo Finish for Racetracks and Liquidity
Other news that is major AB 167 may be the inclusion of California racetracks in a post-regulation landscape, which many felt had been unjustly ignored by previous bills. The sharing of liquidity along with other states, expressly forbidden in preceding draft bills, appears to be on the menu this time, and there is also a suggestion that players on unlicensed sites could be prosecuted.
The license fee would cost $10 million, with a set that is tax-rate 8.5 percent of gross video gaming revenue. As soon as language has been agreed upon, the bill will require two-thirds associated with vote to pass.
New Bill Would Decriminalize Fantasy Sports in Washington
State Senator Pam Roach introduced a bill that will legalize sports that are fantasy in the state of Washington. (Image: PamRoach.com)
Their state of Washington is known for having a number of the harshest gambling that is online in the United States.
However these laws go even further than numerous realize: Washington also considers fantasy sports to be a form of gambling, and therefore players who purchase their online fantasy sports leagues are theoretically breaking the law, and could even be charged by having a felony underneath the exact same guidelines that criminalize online poker and casino games.
That’s something that numerous local officials would like to be changed.
With an estimated 500,000 residents in the state fantasy that is playing games, State Senator Pam Roach (R-31st District) says it’s time and energy to reclassify the contests as being a game of skill instead than as luck-based gambling.
‘Our state views dream football as a game of chance a felony criminal activity,’ Roach said. ‘Congress has long considered dream football become a game of skill. My bill will replace the state’s definition.’
Washington Residents Restricted from Fantasy Sports Sites
At this time, numerous major online fantasy sports outlets block Washington residents from participating on their sites, including top day-to-day dream sites like FanDuel and DraftKings.
Conventional season long leagues on sites like ESPN.com are frequently open to Washington residents, however they are typically ineligible to win prizes.
The issue is that many states see fantasy recreations as a game title of ability.
However the Washington State Gambling Commission still sees luck as being a big factor that is enough classify it as gambling under current state laws.
‘There’s constantly the chance the Seattle Seahawks will return from two touchdowns down with two minutes left,’ said commission chairman Chris Stearns, discussing the Seahawks’ improbable comeback into the NFC Championship game last week-end. ‘Whereas in many states, the fact that you have spent all of this time poring over stats and making your spreadsheets that are own that’s the skill part, and that weighs most greatly.’
Sports Betting Would Remain Prohibited
Under the proposed law, there would nevertheless be a prohibition on placing bets on the result of real life events that are sporting.
However, both day-to-day and fantasy that is season-long will be expressly appropriate, even for real cash play.
The bill seemingly have better chances than a bill that is similar would decriminalize and regulate online poker; the dream recreations bill has bi-partisan support and it has acquired lots of sponsors on both edges of the aisle.
Companion bills have been introduced in both the House of Representatives and hawaii Senate.
The legalization work is supported by the Fantasy Sports Trade Association, an industry group based away from Chicago.
According to your group, more than 41 million people in America and Canada play fantasy sports, and nearly half of them play for real cash.
‘We think citizens of Washington must certanly be able to have fun with the full variety of fantasy sports contests offered in 45 other states and stay able to win prizes in free contests offered by major media companies,’ said association chairman Peter Schoenke in a statement.
Washington is one of five states in which residents are typically blocked from playing on daily fantasy sports sites.
Even as we recently reported, energy is increasing in many of these states to legalize such games: recently, a Montana lawmaker introduced a bill that would allow residents to be involved in contests where the entry cost ended up being $100 or less.
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker Rejects Kenosha Casino Project
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has rejected a proposed casino in Kenosha, with some saying the move may be regarding his presidential aspirations. (Image: Wikimedia Commons)
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has put the kibosh on a proposed casino plan, saying that building the venue would simply be very costly to taxpayers to be allowed.
In a declaration, Walker stated that the continuing state could have been liable for up to $100 million to the Potawatomi tribe, which owns a casino in Milwaukee, because of agreements involving the tribe and the state.
Under the compact that governs the contract between Wisconsin therefore the Potawatomi tribe, hawaii is in charge of reimbursing the tribe for any revenue lost with other casinos that available in their state.
‘After a review that is comprehensive of possible economic impact of the proposed Kenosha casino project, the risk to hawaii’s taxpayers is too great,’ Walker said in a statement. ‘Due to the compacts negotiated by Governor Doyle, the current price to taxpayers of approving the proposed casino task is as much as $100 million plus the long-term economic hit to the state budget would be a potential loss of vast sums of dollars.’
The casino that is new which would have cost about $800 million to build, was to be a joint venture between the Menominee Tribe and intense Rock, which would have been in charge of operating the casino. The project had been approved in 2013 by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, nonetheless it still required approval from the governor of Wisconsin before it could go forward.
Casino Supporters See Politics Behind Decision
The Menominee Tribe saw other motivations behind his decision while Walker said the rejection was a way to protect residents of the state from a financial obligation.
‘One tribe, the Forest County Potawatomi and one goal of Governor Walker, the presidency, has resulted in a ‘no’ for our people,’ the tribe said in a statement.
Many governmental observers believe that Walker could be ladbrokes casino number arranging a run at the Republican nomination for the presidency in 2016. The Menominee statement suggested that Walker’s decision was made to placate conservatives who are opposed to casino gambling. One Iowa that is prominent conservative Tom Coates, recently wrote a letter to Walker urging him to reject the casino. That letter ended up being also signed by 600 caucus that is potential from Iowa.
Regardless of motivation behind Walker’s decision, many locals in Kenosha were disappointed in your decision.
‘ There were people ready to down go to work here, and that is perhaps not going to happen now,’ Kenosha Mayor Keith Bosman told WTMJ.
With Kenosha away from the Way, Beloit Hopes for Federal Attention
It is possible that Kenosha’s loss could be Beloit’s gain. Supporters of a Ho-Chunk Nation casino into the town hope that the rejection associated with the Menominee casino could suggest that their project will pass through federal now review more quickly.
The city and the tribe experienced a preliminary deal in place since 2012, but officials say these were told that the Bureau of Indian Affairs were delaying a decision in part because of the Kenosha proposal. The Ho-Chunk were publicly in opposition to the Kenosha project.
Despite the rejection, nevertheless, the Menominee say they will soldier on.
‘We must remember all the Menominee country has overcome much more than 10,000 years,’ the tribe said in a declaration. ‘ We are going to continue to flourish as being a Nation and will continue to be partners that are honorable Indian Tribes in Wisconsin and around the Nation.’